16 Responses leave one →
  1. April 2, 2009

    I agree wholeheartedly!

    When it comes to crimes against children these people should not have rights. I don’t care if it is entrapment. They are slime bags with nothing but bad intentions.

    The man committed suicide because he obvisouly knew he did something wrong.

    This is a subject I am very passionate about and have to watch my mouth in public forum such as this.

  2. April 2, 2009

    Oh, I totally agree.

    It is their choice to sign the disclosure to appear on TV. There are many that didn’t, or many that asked their face be blurred.

    I honestly don’t think it’s entrapment (which has personally affected my life in a HUGE altering way, so I have strong feelings about it). Entrapment is the officer putting the alleged in a situation they otherwise would not have put themselves into – in order to get them into trouble. These people got on their own computers and engaged in these discussions. They also are twisted enough to already have naked pictures of themselves, and OK the meetings. Police are not present during any of this.

    What about the especially sick ones, that come in naked, or bring whipped cream? That is pre-meditated. Nobody stripped them down, or forced them to go buy foreplay treats. They knew what they were doing, and they’re just sorry to be caught. The show has even featured repeat offenders that didn’t learn their lesson the first time.

    I also have to agree about the suicide. He would have just explained himself and fixed the problem if it weren’t true – but he knew he was a predator and couldn’t face the repurcussion. And, frankly, I can’t blame him. A sex predator in jail is a big enough target – but a former DA sex predator? He’d have been eaten alive.

  3. April 3, 2009

    Great post, I’ll come back for my comment here about this one later.

    But why I write at the moment has more to do with Mr ‘R’ evading questions and saying he’ll call later and not. Two times is a pattern … or is it?

    I already decided it was one time too many but really want some clarity today.

    sagepublishing@mac.com

  4. April 3, 2009

    This show made a BIG difference. I recently bought a book he authored about Internet Safety. Stunning this phenomena occurs. Men out of their minds caught on tape. We have so much more to teach our children than our mothers even considered in their life times. OMG

  5. April 3, 2009

    “I will not be censored on my own blog.”

    That’s the spirit! So many authors tend to avoid topics due to negative responses; write it as you see fit!

  6. April 5, 2009

    It always makes me sick when some a$$hole wins a lawsuit that should never have been brought to court. No one made this man (a freakin’ DA yet–who no doubt prosecuted others for much less) indulge in his perverted fantasies. They also didn’t make him choose death over prison. The only ones entitled to any restitution are any innocent child victims which he may have left behind.

  7. April 5, 2009

    PS–Don’t steer away from controversy. You have a very balanced view of life. And I’m planning on writing more controversial posts myself once I get my freedom back and I hope that doesn’t mean you’ll stop visiting. You can even make snarky comments if you want!

  8. April 7, 2009

    if you enjoyed that, you’ll get fired up about this:
    http://a.abcnews.com/WhatWouldYouDo/Story?id=6613617&page=1

    as a survivor of being drugged and raped, this makes me extra sick.

  9. bob permalink
    April 16, 2009

    Interesting post that caught my attention when looking into this unfortunate incident. Though you’ve self perpetuated the idea that you said something bold, instead you’ve proven yourself a provincial sensationalist. First, celebrating the suicide of anyone with mental disturbances such as pedophilia and depression is despicable (next time censor yourself). Second, the fact that you merely ‘like’ the show doesn’t make it ethically ok. Third, no one in their right mind doesn’t believe twisted predators shouldn’t be caught, but should it be made into a public spectacle for your enjoyment? Lastly, one ought consider the challenge of pedophilia more coherently. Pedophiles are predisposed to having such inclinations, they HAVE to receive physchological evaluation. (suicide should not be encouraged nor should public humiliation be sought). The most depressing issue of this post and the previous comments is the fact that you missed an obvious logical point. Why not boost our efforts in cyber policing and drop the circus? I know I’m commenting rather late but I hope you reconsider your remarks.

    All the best

  10. April 17, 2009

    Wow, Bob. How can anyone defend the acts of a pedophile–unless they “understand” their sick inclinations. They may be predisposed to these feelings, but they know they are doing something very wrong. Which is why they work so hard to cover their tracks and intimidate their little victims. I haven’t seen the show, but I say anything that makes these sickos think twice about harming a child, go for it. For that reason, I enjoy watching America’s Most Wanted. It’s taken a lot of creeps off our streets.
    Sorry, Cyndi. I just had to add my two cents.

  11. April 2, 2009

    It’s funny you say that because I was hesitant to write this post, knowing that it might be controversial. Then I remembered my rule…I will not be censored on my own blog.

  12. April 3, 2009

    Oh boy. I still can’t believe that supposedly adult men are still playing these dating games. IMHO, let it go. If he calls again, he calls again. If not, at least you learned early on that he wasn’t for you.

    Trying to analyze why he is behaving this way is a waste of your precious time. Going over and over your interactions to see if you can come up with something you said or did, “wrong” is too. You have been yourself, there is never anything wrong with that.

    Evading questions, to me, is a HUGE red flag, much worse than the not calling thing. It’s a form of dishonesty. I would argue it’s even more manipulative than blatant lying. Manipulation and dishonesty this early on in a relationship can’t lead to anything good. Again…just my opinion.

  13. April 5, 2009

    Don’t worry, I’m not steering away from controversy, but it did cross my mind. I came to my senses and wrote exactly what I wanted to write. Yay! I love snark, can’t wait until tax season is over. :)

  14. April 7, 2009

    Unreal. I’m sorry that this has happened to you.

  15. April 16, 2009

    I don’t censor myself on my own blog. It’s rule #1. I also don’t take orders from random strangers who, for some unknown reason feel comfortable telling me what I should or shouldn’t say.

    I wasn’t arguing that the show is ethical, just that I enjoy seeing folks who prey on children get caught. I frankly don’t care if they are publicly humiliated. As I said in my post, I hope they work out the legal and ethical issues and put the show back on. I care more about the kids that are being saved than the whack-jobs that get busted on the show.

    As I’m sure you are aware, the rehabilitation of pedophiles is rare, even with the best psychological counseling.

    I agree that boosting efforts in cyber policing in order to catch child predators is a great idea. However, this post was about the tv show, not about how better to police sexual predators.

    I have never encouraged suicide but do not feel any sympathy for these predators, including the one that did take his own life.

    I will not reconsider my remarks but respect your right to disagree.

  16. April 17, 2009

    No need to apologize, your two cents are always welcome! Thank you. :)

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

6 visitors online now
6 guests, 0 members
Max visitors today: 14 at 08:37 am UTC
This month: 51 at 03-02-2010 08:00 pm UTC
This year: 58 at 02-10-2010 04:52 pm UTC
All time: 58 at 02-10-2010 04:52 pm UTC